Cold Knife Conization Vs. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in Premalignant Cervical Lesions in a Cohort of Females in Romania
Cămărășan Ovidiu, Cămărășan Andreea, Mureșan Mihaela, Orosz Arnold, Pop Alex Caleb, Vese Sara Alexandra, Vigdorovits Alon and Maghiar Adrian
Cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) are two methods of minimally
invasive treatment used in Romania for high-grade cervical dysplasia. The purpose of this study is to
identify correlations between the results of the Papanicolaou (PAP) smear and biopsy and to evaluate
the positivity of resection margins in both types of conizations: cold knife conization versus LEEP. The 96
cases enrolled in this study were gathered from ‘Prof. Dr. Ioan Pușcaș’ City Hospital of Șimleu Silvaniei,
Romania, in a time interval from 01.01.2022 to 01.01.2024. The results of our study showed that out of
20 women who underwent PAP smear for ASC-US, 4 were actually found to have high-grade squamous
intraepithelial lesion (H-SIL) according to biopsy results. The estimated risk in females who underwent
LEEP procedure with positive margins in the histopathological examination, in the studied population,
is almost 0.5 times higher compared to those who underwent cold knife conization. Histopathological
examination of cervical specimens is the gold standard method in detecting high-risk cervical lesions.
Our study shows that positive deep endocervical margins are more likely to occur in loop electrosurgical
excision procedures compared with cold knife conization.
